![]()
lets say one man owned the whole united states food supply. In conclusion, monopolies are only dangerous IF the monopoly is a necessity based. No, it exploded in the main cities while it also exploded with the whole country According to the "monopoly=bad" argument, service in Mexico should have dropped in every other city that is not important in Mexico's economy while service should have exploded in cities such as Mexico City and Puebla. The year Telcel was monopolized by Carlos Slim (riches man in the world now) coverage in Mexico grew more than it did in the hands of the state. If you look at the Mexican carrier, Telcel. do you think you will pay whatever cellphone company if the price exceeds a certain comfort zone in your income bracket? you wont.įurthermore, I will take it one more step. So basically, monopolies will start losing more money when they start raising the price since consumers will either 1) not be able to access such services (since they will only make the MIN amount for MAX price and by using calculus, you would rather spend a little more in the amount produced and make a little less profit rather than having an EXACT amount although you would make the best profit IF you sold ALL items) or 2) consumers will just stop using it since cell phone devices are not a NECESSITY but instead a WANT. The unfulfilled desire of those neglected consumers is the social cost of monopoly. When the amount produced is LESS than the socially optimal quantity, it means not serving some consumers who are perfectly willing to pay MORE than the minimum price that the producer requires but who are unwilling to bear the price at which the monopoly firm can max its profit. UNDER NORMAL CIRCUMSTANCES, the level of output is lower than the socially optimal one, which is where the max price a consumer is willing to pay is the same as the minimum price that the producer requires in order not to lose money. In a competitive market, producers dont have the freedom to set a price because the rival can always undercut them until the point where lowering the price will cause in a loss.īUT the monopolist firm can decide the price it charges by varying the quantity it produces, so it will produce only up to the quantity where its profit is maximized. Monopolies cause "allocative deadweight loss" (although its main argument applies towards state-owned enterprises) Well, this is macrumors and i try to stay away from economic theories, but you asked for it, so here we go: We are moving to a web-based infrastructure and the old client-server model that MS is based on is going away. People stick with MS because that is what they know, and they are scared of OSX/Macs. Aside from a general question here and there, I never get called about serious system issues. It even included iPads that doctors would carry around to interface with a web-enabled database. I put in a all-OSX network in a medical center not long ago -not one MS product used. Problem with a mac? Use screen sharing to go check it out. You can use shared libraries to further enhance this. If you use Open Directory and Preferences, you can control networked Macs. They just make crappy operating systems and servers. This is where the company shines (Access is really great product). Now before I get accused of MS bashing, I will point out that MS makes excellent front-end applications such as Office. Why on Server 2008 does the utility "Server Management" and "Manage Server" point to 2 totally different applications? Sounds like someone is shipping off projects to India and not paying attention. Microsoft has been in disarray for years and it shows. #My stocks geektool windowsI could go on and on, but this is a productivity issue: I am not as productive on Windows as I am on a Mac. I had to rig the system to run some of these apps (more wasted time). Many 3rd party and legacy applications do not work correctly, even when run in compatibility mode. #My stocks geektool windows 7This is Microsoft preventing you from installing 3rd party browsers into Windows 7 -I don't have these issues on my Mac (I run 3 browsers there)Ģ. ![]() #My stocks geektool installI have had to fix the registry twice after installing Opera -if you install that into Windows 7 the system starts generating security errors and warnings, and you can no longer open hyperlinks in Outlook. It is a brand new machine, but neverthelessġ. I have to use Windows 7 at work in order to run Cisco tools I use. #My stocks geektool softwareWhy do Windows machines use Group Policies? To push software out to machines, sure -but the real reason is to lock down machines that are by their very design security risks. I find that people who claim supporting Macs is just a labor-intensive as supporting Windows machines are those who haven't implemented Macs properly and really don't know what they are doing. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |